CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Quiller Consultants

British lobbying and public relations firm

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 20, 2025
Entity authorityQ60775005 ↗
Source-derived summary

Quiller Consultants is a British lobbying and public relations firm based in Westminster in central London that has close links to the Conservative party.

The company was formed in 1998 by John Eisenhammer, a former journalist with The Independent and Jonathan Hill, a former Whitehall mandarin. Both had previously worked at Bell Pottinger and Hill was later made a life peer by the Conservatives. In 2006, Quiller was acquired by Huntsworth, a company owned by Peter Gummer who ran the Conservative party in David Cameron's constituency.

Employees

Current or former employees include:

Gerard Russell - a former British diplomat in the Middle East who was in charge of Quilter's work on behalf of the United Arab Emirates including briefing journalists to write negative articles on Qatar.

George Bridges - former political director for David Cameron and a Conservative life peer since 2015.

Howell James - former adviser to John Major and the CEO of Quiller from 2014 to 2017.

Sarah Jones - Labour MP for Croydon.

Stephen Parkinson - previously worked for David Cameron and was later appointed as an adviser to Theresa May

Sean Worth - former adviser to David Cameron.

Clients

A4e

British Land

Capita

CDC Group

City of London Corporation - during the Occupy London protests.

Editorial summary

“Quiller Consultants” enters the record as british lobbying and public relations firm. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Quiller, Consultants and British can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1998, 2006, 2015, 2014—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Quiller, Consultants and British.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Quiller Consultants” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Quiller, Consultants and British provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 20, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q60775005. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1998, 2006, 2015 and 2014.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Quiller Consultants”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Quiller Consultants primary sources, Quiller Consultants archive and Quiller research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Quiller Consultants”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Quiller Consultants” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.