CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Prune plum

subspecies of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ13223298
Source-derived summary

The prune plum (Prunus domestica subsp. domestica) is a fruit-bearing tree, or its fruit. It is a subspecies of the plum Prunus domestica. The freestone fruit is especially popular in Central Europe.

Names

The fruit is known under various regional names, including "blue plum", "damask plum", "sugar plum", and "German prune". It is called Zwetschge (, plural Zwetschgen) and similar words in German-speaking regions. The German names, and English damson for a similar fruit, are thought ultimately to derive from postulated Vulgar Latin *davascena, altered from damascena, meaning "of Damascus". In Alsace they are known as quetsches and an eau de vie is made with them.

Description

The prune plum tree is often found in streuobstwiesen. It grows to 6–10 metres (20–33 ft) in height; older trees have spreading branches.

Editorial summary

“Prune plum” enters the record as subspecies of plant. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Prune, plum and subspecies can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 130-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Prune, plum and subspecies.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Prune plum” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Prune, plum and subspecies provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q13223298. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Prune plum”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Prune plum primary sources, Prune plum archive and Prune research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Prune plum”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Prune plum” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.