CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Quercus robur subsp. pedunculiflora

subspecies of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 19, 2025
Entity authorityQ21384335 ↗
Source-derived summary

Quercus robur subsp. pedunculiflora, or Quercus pedunculiflora, the grayish oak, is a subspecies of flowering plant in the beech and oak family, Fagaceae. Its a large tree, native to South-Eastern Europe, in the Balkan Peninsula and Peloponnesos, through Thrace and Eastern Anatolia, and the Caucasus. It can be found in deciduous forest, flood plains and steppes, up to 1800 m above sea level. It is a drought adapted species, being able to tolerate extreme heat, and for this reason Q. robur subsp. pedunculiflora may become a very important tree species for forestry, particularly in the context of global climate change.

Taxonomy

Quercus robur subsp. pedunculiflora is a species controversial in taxonomy. Some authors consider it as only a race of Quercus robur, the differences from the common subspecies being the result of an adaptation to drier climates and probable intermixture from other species (Quercus pubescens and Quercus petraea in the north of its range and Quercus infectoria in the south). This theory agrees with authors who noticed introgression of Quercus robur with more drought adapted oak species (Kleinschmit 1993), which took place at the time of the migration of Quercus robur into the Quercus pubescens area and vice versa.

Editorial summary

“Quercus robur subsp. pedunculiflora” enters the record as subspecies of plant. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Quercus, robur and subsp can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1800, 1993—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Quercus, robur and subsp.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Quercus robur subsp. pedunculiflora” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Quercus, robur and subsp provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 19, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q21384335. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1800 and 1993.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Quercus robur subsp. pedunculiflora”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Quercus robur subsp. pedunculiflora primary sources, Quercus robur subsp. pedunculiflora archive and Quercus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Quercus robur subsp. pedunculiflora”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Quercus robur subsp. pedunculiflora” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.