CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Quercus cerris

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ157277 ↗
Source-derived summary

Quercus cerris, the Turkey oak or Austrian oak, is a species of oak in the beech family (Fagaceae). It is native to southern and south-eastern Europe, Asia Minor, and the Levant, but has been introduced outside its range. It is the type species of Quercus sect. Cerris, a section of the genus characterised by shoot buds surrounded by soft bristles, bristle-tipped leaf lobes, and acorns that usually mature in 18 months.

Taxonomy and evolution

Turkey oak was formally described by Carl Linnaeus in his 1753 Species Plantarum. The species epiphet — cerris — derives from the Latin name for the species, cerrus, which in turn may have come from a root meaning 'hard', or from a Berber term for oak.

Within the genus Quercus, Quercus cerris is classified in section Cerris of the subgenus Cerris, which is distributed in Eurasia, with a centre of diversity in the eastern Mediterranean. Within sect. Cerris, Turkey oak is in turn classified in the subsection Cerris, alongside Q. castaneifolia and Q. look, which are endemic to the Hyrcanian forests and the Levant, respectively.

After the last glacial, Turkey oak was restricted to areas south of the Alps, however, fossil galls preserved at the site of Raalte, the Netherlands, described in 2008, yielded indirect evidence that Turkey oak was present in northwestern Europe during the Eemian interglacial (130-115 thousand years ago), which preceded the last glacial.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Quercus cerris” as species of plant. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Quercus, cerris and species.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1753, 2008—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Quercus, cerris and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Quercus cerris”, the useful work is to connect “species of plant” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q157277. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1753 and 2008.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Quercus cerris”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Quercus cerris primary sources, Quercus cerris archive and Quercus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Quercus cerris”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Quercus cerris” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.