CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Nibble

four-bit unit of digital information

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ740943
Source-derived summary

In computing, a nibble, also spelled nybble to match byte, is a unit of information consisting of four bits, equivalent to one half of a byte or octet (data units of eight-bit length). The unit is alternatively called a nybl, half-byte or tetrad. In computer networking and telecommunications, the unit is also sometimes called a semi-octet, quadbit, or quartet.

A nibble uses four digits in binary positional notation (base 2) to encode one of sixteen (

2

4

{\textstyle 2^{4}}

) possible values, representing the same amount of information stored by two digits in the quaternary numeral system (base 4) or just a single hexadecimal ("hex") digit (base 16). That functional equivalence allows nibbles to typically be represented by a single hex digit, and likewise, byte values by a pair of hex digits.

Four-bit computers use nibble-sized data for storage and operations, in the form of the word unit. Such computers were used in early microprocessors, pocket calculators and pocket computers, and continue to be used in some microcontrollers. In this context, 4-bit groups were sometimes also called characters or digits rather than nibbles.

History

The term nibble originates from its representing half a byte, with byte a homophone of the English word bite. David B. Benson may have coined its use to describe four-bit values as a joke while working as a professor at Washington State University in 1958.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Nibble” is four-bit unit of digital information. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Nibble, four-bit and unit, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1958—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Nibble, four-bit and unit is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “four-bit unit of digital information” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q740943. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1958.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Nibble”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Nibble primary sources, Nibble archive and Nibble research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nibble”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Nibble” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.