CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Qoʻshkoʻpir

town in Uzbekistan

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ650339 ↗
Source-derived summary

Qoʻshkoʻpir (Uzbek: Qoʻshkoʻpir, Қўшкўпир, قۉش‌كۉپیر; Russian: Кошкупыр, romanized: Koshkupyr) is an urban-type settlement and seat of Qoʻshkoʻpir District in Xorazm Region in Uzbekistan. Its population is 18,700 (2016).

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Qoʻshkoʻpir” is town in Uzbekistan. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Qoʻshkoʻpir, town and Uzbekistan, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA valuable geographic starting point for tracing changing names, boundaries, uses and administrative responsibility. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2016—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Qoʻshkoʻpir, town and Uzbekistan is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “town in Uzbekistan” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q650339. VIAF identifies the subject as 143282187. The Library of Congress control number is n2006037730. Authority coordinates are 41.533, 60.350. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2016.

Critical limits

Architectural summaries often privilege surviving fabric and can understate demolished phases, contested use or displaced communities. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Qoʻshkoʻpir”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Qoʻshkoʻpir primary sources, Qoʻshkoʻpir archive and Qoʻshkoʻpir research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Qoʻshkoʻpir”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Qoʻshkoʻpir” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.