CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Diamondback Energy

U.S. energy company

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ65091423
Source-derived summary

Diamondback Energy, headquartered in Midland, Texas, is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Permian Basin.

As of December 31, 2024, the company had 3,557 million barrels of oil equivalent (2.176×1010 GJ) of estimated proved reserves, of which 49% was petroleum, 24% was natural gas, and 27% was natural gas liquids. It is ranked 383rd on the Fortune 500 and 471st on the Forbes Global 2000.

History

The company began operations in December 2007 with the acquisition of 4,174 net acres in the Permian Basin. In October 2012, the company became a public company via an initial public offering, issuing 12,500,000 shares of common stock at a price of $17.50 per share at its opening on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol FANG, in reference to a snake's tooth; the company's logo at the time featured a Western diamondback rattlesnake.

In March 2017, the company acquired assets from Brigham Resources for $2.55 billion. In October 2018, the company acquired the assets of Ajax Resources for $1.25 billion. In November 2018, the company acquired Energen.

In February 2021, the company acquired leasehold interests and assets from Guidon Resources for $375 million in cash and 10.68 million shares. In March 2021, the company acquired QEP Resources.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Diamondback Energy” is u.S. energy company. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Diamondback, Energy and energy, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2024, 1010, 2000, 2007—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2007-01-01. For this dossier, Diamondback, Energy and energy is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “u.S. energy company” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q65091423. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2024, 1010, 2000 and 2007.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Diamondback Energy”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Diamondback Energy primary sources, Diamondback Energy archive and Diamondback research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Diamondback Energy”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Diamondback Energy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.