CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Pyrenula biseptata

species of lichen

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 7, 2025
Entity authorityQ108307067
Source-derived summary

Pyrenula biseptata is a rare species of corticolous (bark-dwelling) crustose lichen in the family Pyrenulaceae. It was formally described as a new species in 2018 by the lichenologists André Aptroot and Marcela Cáceres. This lichen is distinguished by its unique ascospores that are divided by exactly two internal cross-walls, a rare characteristic that makes it one of only two species in its genus with this feature. It grows on smooth tree bark in primary rainforest in northern Brazil and forms a thin, dark brown crust with small black, flask-shaped fruiting bodies.

Taxonomy

Pyrenula biseptata was formally described in 2018 by André Aptroot and Marcela Cáceres during a survey of tropical pyrenocarpous lichens in Brazil. It is distinguished within the genus Pyrenula by its consistently 2-septate ascospores—a rare trait in both lichenised and non-lichenised fungi, as most species typically produce spores with 1 or 3 septa. This makes P. biseptata one of only two species in the genus known to possess this character; the other, P. lineatostroma, differs in having fused ascomata (pseudostromata) and a non-inspersed hamathecium.

Description

Pyrenula biseptata is a crustose lichen that forms a thin, smooth, dark brown thallus. It lacks features such as pseudocyphellae (small pores or breaks in the surface) and visible deposits of crystals. The photobiont partner is a green alga from the genus Trentepohlia, commonly found in tropical lichens.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Pyrenula biseptata” as species of lichen. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2018—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Pyrenula, biseptata and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of lichen. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 7, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q108307067. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2018.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pyrenula biseptata”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pyrenula biseptata primary sources, Pyrenula biseptata archive and Pyrenula research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pyrenula biseptata”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Pyrenula biseptata” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.