CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Pyrausta tenuilinea

species of insect

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 31, 2026
Entity authorityQ14241521 ↗
Source-derived summary

Pyrausta tenuilinea is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by George Hampson in 1913 and it is found in Panama.

The wingspan is about 14 mm. The forewings are purplish pink with a yellowish antemedial line. The hindwings are whitish suffused with brown and a black terminal line.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Pyrausta tenuilinea” as species of insect. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Pyrausta, tenuilinea and species.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1913—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Pyrausta, tenuilinea and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Pyrausta tenuilinea”, the useful work is to connect “species of insect” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q14241521. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1913.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pyrausta tenuilinea”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pyrausta tenuilinea primary sources, Pyrausta tenuilinea archive and Pyrausta research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pyrausta tenuilinea”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Pyrausta tenuilinea” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.