Pycnocentrodes aeris
species of insect

Pycnocentrodes aeris, also known as the common stony-cased caddisfly, is a species of caddisfly belonging to the family Conoesucidae. The species was first described by Keith Arthur John Wise in 1958, and is endemic to New Zealand.
Taxonomy
The species was identified by Wise in 1958, based on a specimen collected from Kinloch on the northern shores of Lake Wakatipu in 1926 by C. E. Clarke.
Description
Wise's original text (the type description) reads as follows:
ANTERIOR WING almost colourless, markings pale testaceous being two elongate transverse dots near base and two parallel transverse lines arising where Sc and R1 meet the costa and finishing at two-thirds where they join abruptly and continue as a single line almost to the dorsum just before the tornus. POSTERIOR WING almost colourless.
WING VENATION. Differs mainly from P. aureola (McLachlan) in the posterior wing where R2 and R3 arise separately, as in P. chiltoni
Tillyard, and from P. chiltoni in the anterior wing where apical fork 3 is fully formed, as in P. aureola. Length of anterior wing, 7–10 mm (0.28–0.39 in). Genitalia♂. Very close to P. aureola except that the spurs of the penis arise from its apex which is truncate and slightly bifid above. The spurs are moderately long, straight, and lie along each side of the penis..
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Pycnocentrodes aeris” as species of insect. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of insect. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1884681. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1958 and 1926.
Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Pycnocentrodes aeris”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Pycnocentrodes aeris primary sources, Pycnocentrodes aeris archive and Pycnocentrodes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pycnocentrodes aeris”?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Pycnocentrodes aeris” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.