Pushpanjali
Hindu ritual
Pushpanjali (Sanskrit:पुष्पाञ्जलि, literally folded hands full of flowers) is an offering of flowers to Hindu deities.
Pushpanjali is the offering of flowers to Hindu gods and goddesses. Pushpanjali is the combination of two words, pushpam and anjali. In Sanskrit, pushpam means flower and anjali means offering with folded hands.
Bharatnatyam
Pushpanjali is also an invocatory dance conducted at the beginning of a Bharatnatyam performance. It is the salutation to Lord Nataraja, the Guru, the musicians, and the audience. In this rite, the dancer, either solo or in unison, cups fresh flowers in both hands and offers them in a continuous stream, invoking blessings and auspiciousness before the performance proper begins.
The dancer holds flowers to offer prayers to the Trinity of Gods, goddesses, ashta dikpalakas, and scholars in dance. By uniting ritual worship with classical technique, Pushpanjali frames the Margam sequence, establishing both spiritual intent and artistic focus at the outset of the recital.
Etymology
The word Pushpanjali comes from Sanskrit: pushpa meaning "flower," and anjali meaning "an offering made by cupping the hands" or "salutation gesture." In this light, Pushpanjali literally translates to "flower-offering," encapsulating both the devotional act of presenting flowers and the ritual gesture of joined palms.
“Pushpanjali” enters the record as hindu ritual. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Pushpanjali, Hindu and ritual can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Pushpanjali” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Pushpanjali, Hindu and ritual provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q13113395. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Pushpanjali”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Pushpanjali primary sources, Pushpanjali archive and Pushpanjali research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pushpanjali”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Pushpanjali” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.