CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Punctilious

British-bred Thoroughbred racehorse

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 1, 2025
Entity authorityQ22006580
Source-derived summary

Punctilous (foaled 7 May 2001) is a British Thoroughbred racehorse and broodmare. Bred in England by Björn Nielsen she showed very promising form as a juvenile in 2003, winning her first two starts before finishing third in the Fillies' Mile. In the following year she developed into a top-class middle distance performer, winning the Musidora Stakes and the Ribblesdale Stakes as well as finishing second in the Irish Oaks and the E. P. Taylor Stakes, third in The Oaks and fourth in the Yorkshire Oaks. In 2005 she made little impact in her first two starts but then won the Chalice Stakes before recording her biggest victory in the Yorkshire Oaks. She was retired from racing at the end of the year to become a broodmare.

Background

Punctilious is a bay mare with a white star bred in the United Kingdom by her owner Bjorn Nielsen. She was sired by Danehill a highly successful breeding stallion who sired the winners of more than a thousand races, including one hundred and fifty-six at Group One/Grade I level. Among his best offspring were Dylan Thomas, Rock of Gibraltar, George Washington and North Light.

Punctilious's dam Robertet was a high-class staying racemare who recorded her biggest win in the Grand Prix de Deauville as a four-year-old in 1990. Apart from Punctilious she produced Risk Seeker whose wins included the Sagaro Stakes, the Prix de Lutèce and the Prix Berteux.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Punctilious” as british-bred Thoroughbred racehorse. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2001, 2003, 2005, 1990—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2001-05-07. The account is most persuasive where Punctilious, British-bred and Thoroughbred can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as british-bred Thoroughbred racehorse. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 1, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q22006580. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2001, 2003, 2005 and 1990.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Punctilious”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Punctilious primary sources, Punctilious archive and Punctilious research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Punctilious”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Punctilious” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.