CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Pultenaea skinneri

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 8, 2023
Entity authorityQ15525871 ↗
Source-derived summary

Pultenaea skinneri, commonly known as Skinner's pea, is a species of flowering plant in the family Fabaceae and is endemic to the south-west of Western Australia. It is a slender shrub with simple leaves, and yellow, red and orange flowers with red markings.

Description

Pultenaea skinneri is a slender shrub that typically grows to a height of 1–2 m (3 ft 3 in – 6 ft 7 in). The leaves are arranged alternately along the stems, simple, 6.5–10 mm (0.26–0.39 in) long and 1.2–4.2 mm (0.047–0.165 in) wide with stipules 1.7–3.2 mm (0.067–0.126 in) long at the base. Each flower is arranged on a hairy pedicel 2.5–3 mm (0.098–0.118 in) long with bracteoles attached. The sepals are 8–11 mm (0.31–0.43 in) long, the standard petal is yellow or orange with a red base and 17–19 mm (0.67–0.75 in) long, the wings 13–17 mm (0.51–0.67 in) long and the keel 13–16 mm (0.51–0.63 in) long. Flowering occurs from July to September and the fruit is a flattened pod.

Taxonomy

Pultenaea skinneri was first formally described by botanist Ferdinand von Mueller in 1874 in Fragmenta Phytographiae Australiae, from specimens collected by Mary Ann McHard near the Blackwood River in south-western Western Australia. McHard collected over 2,000 specimens, now conserved in the National Herbarium of Victoria. The specific epithet, (skinneri), honours George Skinner, an employee of the Victorian Government Printer, where the Fragmenta was published.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Pultenaea skinneri” as species of plant. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Pultenaea, skinneri and species.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1874—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Pultenaea, skinneri and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Pultenaea skinneri”, the useful work is to connect “species of plant” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 8, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q15525871. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1874.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pultenaea skinneri”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pultenaea skinneri primary sources, Pultenaea skinneri archive and Pultenaea research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pultenaea skinneri”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Pultenaea skinneri” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.