Pultenaea sericea
Flora
Pultenaea sericea, commonly known as chaffy bush-pea, is a species of flowering plant in the family Fabaceae and is endemic to south-eastern Australia. It is a small, straggling shrub with hairy branches, elliptic to linear leaves, and yellow and red to purple, pea-like flowers.
Description
Pultenaea sericea is a small, straggling shrub that typically grows to a height of 20–30 cm (7.9–11.8 in) with hairy branches. The leaves are arranged alternately, elliptic to linear, 6–25 mm (0.24–0.98 in) long and 1–3 mm (0.039–0.118 in) wide with a sharp point on the end and stipules 5–10 mm (0.20–0.39 in) long pressed against the stem at the base. The flowers are arranged in dense clusters of more than three, each flower on a pedicel 0.5–1 mm (0.020–0.039 in) long with a few papery bracts at the base and linear bracteoles 3–5 mm (0.12–0.20 in) long attached to the sepal tube. The sepals are 5.0–5.5 mm (0.20–0.22 in) long, the standard petal is yellow to orange and 7.8–10 mm (0.31–0.39 in) long, the wings are yellow to orange and 7.5–9 mm (0.30–0.35 in) long, and the keel is red to purple and 7.2–9 mm (0.28–0.35 in) long. Flowering occurs from September to November and the fruit is a flattened pod 5–6 mm (0.20–0.24 in) long.
Taxonomy
Chaffy bush-pea was first formally described in 1864 by George Bentham who gave it the name Pultenaea paleacea var. sericea in Flora Australiensis. In 1995, Margaret Georgina Corrick raised the variety to species status as Pultenaea sericea in the journal Muelleria, and the name is accepted by the Australian Plant Census.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Pultenaea sericea” is flora. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Pultenaea, sericea and Flora, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “flora” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 8, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q61717325. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1864 and 1995.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Pultenaea sericea”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Pultenaea sericea primary sources, Pultenaea sericea archive and Pultenaea research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pultenaea sericea”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Pultenaea sericea” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.