CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Publius Rutilius Rufus

Roman consul 105 BC

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ442449 ↗
Source-derived summary

Publius Rutilius Rufus (c. 160 BC – after 78 BC) was a Roman politician, soldier, orator, and historian. He was consul in 105 BC, with Gnaeus Mallius Maximus as his colleague. A military man, he had served in more junior roles in wars against Numantia, Jugurtha, and the Cimbri.

After his consulship, while serving as a legate of Quintus Mucius Scaevola in provincial Asia, he attempted to safeguard the population from extortion by influential equites. Prosecuted at Rome c. 94 BC for extorting those same provincials, according to the Ciceronean tradition he was unjustly condemned. He then left for exile in Asia, settling at Mytilene and Smyrna, living among those he had supposedly extorted. The author of a history of Rome in Greek, he survived the upheavals of the Mithridatic Wars and was still alive in the early 70s BC when Cicero visited him there.

Early life

The child of a homonymous father who had served as plebeian tribune in 169 BC, Rutilius also had a brother called Gaius and a sister. His early political career was likely rocky: his father's citizenship was stripped by the censors shortly his tribunate amid a clash with them; he also had no known consular ancestors. Rufus studied philosophy under Panaetius (becoming a Stoic), law, and public speaking under Sulpicius Galba.

Editorial summary

“Publius Rutilius Rufus” enters the record as roman consul 105 BC. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Publius, Rutilius and Rufus can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 217-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The linked authority record independently contributes the date -0158-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Publius, Rutilius and Rufus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Publius Rutilius Rufus” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Publius, Rutilius and Rufus provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q442449. VIAF identifies the subject as 51581927. The Library of Congress control number is nr95029631. 3 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Publius Rutilius Rufus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Publius Rutilius Rufus primary sources, Publius Rutilius Rufus archive and Publius research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Publius Rutilius Rufus”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Publius Rutilius Rufus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.