CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Public Relations Review

journal

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 28, 2023
Entity authorityQ7257537 ↗
Source-derived summary

Public Relations Review is a peer-reviewed academic journal covering public relations that is published quarterly by Elsevier. The editor-in-chief is Maureen Taylor. It was established in 1975. According to Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2019 impact factor of 2.321, placing it in the second quartile for Communication studies and in the third quartile for Business.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Public Relations Review” is journal. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Public, Relations and Review, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1975, 2019—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1975-01-01. For this dossier, Public, Relations and Review is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “journal” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 28, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q7257537. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1975 and 2019.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Public Relations Review”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Public Relations Review primary sources, Public Relations Review archive and Public research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Public Relations Review”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Public Relations Review” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.