CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Psittacosis

disease

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ164727
Source-derived summary

Psittacosis, also known as parrot fever or ornithosis, is a zoonotic infectious disease caused by the bacterium Chlamydia psittaci. Birds are the main reservoir, and human infection usually follows inhalation of aerosolised dried droppings or respiratory secretions from infected birds. Although many human infections are mild, psittacosis can cause pneumonia and occasionally severe complications including endocarditis, hepatitis, and neurologic disease.

Transmission and reservoirs

C. psittaci commonly infects birds, including psittacine birds such as parrots, parakeets, cockatiels, and budgerigars, but human infection has also been linked to pigeons, turkeys, chickens, ducks, and other birds. Many infected birds have no obvious clinical signs but may shed organisms in feces and respiratory secretions for prolonged periods.

Humans are infected mainly by inhaling dust contaminated with dried droppings or respiratory secretions from infected birds. Less common routes include bites and beak-to-mouth contact. There is no evidence that psittacosis is spread by handling or eating poultry products, and documented person-to-person transmission is very rare.

Signs and symptoms

The incubation period is usually 5 to 14 days, although symptom onset may occasionally occur later. In humans, psittacosis ranges from asymptomatic infection or a mild influenza-like illness to severe atypical pneumonia.

Editorial summary

“Psittacosis” enters the record as disease. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Psittacosis and disease can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 194-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Psittacosis and disease.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Psittacosis” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Psittacosis and disease provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q164727. The Library of Congress control number is sh85108328. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Psittacosis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Psittacosis primary sources, Psittacosis archive and Psittacosis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Psittacosis”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Psittacosis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.