CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Psilophytopsida

class of plants

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ17147573
Source-derived summary

Psilophytopsida is a now obsolete class containing one order, Psilophytales, which was previously used to classify a number of extinct plants which are now placed elsewhere. The class was established in 1917, under the name Psilophyta, with only three genera (Rhynia, Horneophyton and Psilophyton) for a group of fossil plants from the Upper Silurian and Devonian periods which lack true roots and leaves, but have a vascular system within a branching cylindrical stem. The living Psilotaceae, the whisk-ferns, were sometimes added to the class, which was then usually called Psilopsida. This classification is no longer in use.

The class should not be confused with the current use of the name Psilotopsida, which refers to a class of living ferns, containing only Psilotaceae (whisk-ferns) and Ophioglossaceae (moon-worts and adder's-tongue ferns).

Description

The class was created in 1917 by Kidston and Lang for fossils found in the Rhynie Chert Bed. Three genera were initially included, Rhynia, Horneophyton and Psilophyton. All lacked leaves and true roots, consisting only of branched stems; however they were considered to contain vascular tissue.

Additional fossil genera were added later. As described by Sporne in 1966, Psilophytopsida consisted of four families:

Rhyniaceae

Rhynia – now placed in the class Rhyniopsida

Horneophyton – now placed in the class Horneophytopsida

Cooksonia – now considered to be paraphyletic basal trachaeophytes

Yarravia – uncertain position

Zosterophyllaceae – now placed in the class Zosterophyllopsida

Zosterophyllum

Psilophytaceae

Psilophyton – now considered to be a basal euphyllophyte

Asteroxylaceae – now placed in the order Drepanophycales

Asteroxylon

By 1975, it had become clear that the class had become increasingly unnatural, containing unrelated early vascular plants.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Psilophytopsida” as class of plants. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1917, 1966, 1975—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Psilophytopsida, class and plants can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as class of plants. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17147573. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1917, 1966 and 1975.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Psilophytopsida”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Psilophytopsida primary sources, Psilophytopsida archive and Psilophytopsida research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Psilophytopsida”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Psilophytopsida” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.