CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Pseudaeromonas pectinilytica

genus of bacteria

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 30, 2025
Entity authorityQ62897973 ↗
Source-derived summary

Pseudaeromonas pectinilytica is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped facultatively anaerobic and motile bacterium from the genus of Pseudaeromonas which has been isolated from a freshwater stream from Jeonju in Korea.

Editorial summary

“Pseudaeromonas pectinilytica” enters the record as genus of bacteria. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Pseudaeromonas, pectinilytica and genus can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 28-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Pseudaeromonas, pectinilytica and genus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Pseudaeromonas pectinilytica” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Pseudaeromonas, pectinilytica and genus provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 30, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q62897973. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pseudaeromonas pectinilytica”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pseudaeromonas pectinilytica primary sources, Pseudaeromonas pectinilytica archive and Pseudaeromonas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pseudaeromonas pectinilytica”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Pseudaeromonas pectinilytica” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.