CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Protocols for Native American Archival Materials

set of Best Professional Practices

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ105560355 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Protocols for Native American Archival Materials (PNAAM) is a set of best professional practices around the care and use of American Indian archival materials that are held in non-tribal libraries, archives, museums, and other cultural institutions.

Development

PNAAM was originally developed by the First Archivist Circle in 2006 to promote conversation, collaboration, and cultural sensitivity. They were highly influenced by Australia's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Protocols for Libraries, Archives, and Information Services. PNAAM complements the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990, which does not cover the repatriation of archival materials that are not human remains or funerary items. Recent scholarship notes that the concept of archival sovereignty and the connection between archival practices and indigenous wellbeing have become more central part of conversations of indigenous archival materials. Many indigenous communities recognized how items are not just a piece of documentation but a piece of memory of those who came before us. This shows us how PNAAM and NAGPRA go hand in hand with each other, how it is important to have these rules about how indigenous culture is archived.

Archivists and other activists presented the document to the Society of American Archivists (SAA) in 2008 and again in 2012, but SAA declined to endorse the document both times. Critics' comments included culturally insensitive and white supremacist language and promoted the traditional Western view of archives, that all researchers should be provided with unrestricted access to archival materials. Research shows that many Native American tribes maintain cultural specific information that is based on either the season, the gender, or the ceremony.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Protocols for Native American Archival Materials” as set of Best Professional Practices. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2006, 1990, 2008, 2012—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Protocols, Native and American can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as set of Best Professional Practices. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q105560355. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2006, 1990, 2008 and 2012.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Protocols for Native American Archival Materials”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Protocols for Native American Archival Materials primary sources, Protocols for Native American Archival Materials archive and Protocols research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Protocols for Native American Archival Materials”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Protocols for Native American Archival Materials” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.