CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Labdia anarithma

species of moth, native to Australia and New Zealand

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 1, 2025
Entity authorityQ6466848 ↗
Source-derived summary

Labdia anarithma is a moth of the family Cosmopterigidae. It was described by Edward Meyrick in 1888. It is found in New Zealand and throughout Australia. Adults are on the wing from December to March and are day flying. They have been collected by sweeping bracken fern.

Taxonomy

This species was first described by Edward Meyrick in 1889 and named Proterocosma anarithma. In 1897 Meyrick placed this species within the genus Pyroderces. This species was then placed in the genus Labdia in 1927 by A. Jefferis Turner. This placement was confirmed in 1996 in the Checklist of Australian Lepidoptera. The lectotype specimen, collected in New Plymouth by Meyrick, is held at the Natural History Museum, London.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Labdia anarithma” is species of moth, native to Australia and New Zealand. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Labdia, anarithma and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1888, 1889, 1897, 1927—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Labdia, anarithma and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of moth, native to Australia and New Zealand” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 1, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q6466848. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1888, 1889, 1897 and 1927.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Labdia anarithma”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Labdia anarithma primary sources, Labdia anarithma archive and Labdia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Labdia anarithma”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Labdia anarithma” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.