Prostoma
genus of worms

Prostoma is a genus of freshwater nemerteans, containing the following species:
Prostoma asensoriatum Montgomery, 1896
Prostoma canadiensis Gibson & Moore, 1978
Prostoma communopore Senz, 1996
Prostoma eilhardi (Montgomery, 1894)
Prostoma graecense (Böhmig, 1892)
Prostoma hercegovinense Tarman, 1961
Prostoma jenningsi Gibson & Young, 1971
Prostoma kolasai Gibson & Moore, 1976
Prostoma ohmiense Chernyshev et al., 1998
Prostoma puteale Beauchamp, 1932
References
External links
J. Norenburg & R. Gibson (2011). Gibson R (ed.). "Prostoma Duges, 1828". World Nemertea Database. World Register of Marine Species. Retrieved December 1, 2011.
The public source identifies “Prostoma” as genus of worms. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Prostoma, genus and worms.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Prostoma”, the useful work is to connect “genus of worms” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2854795. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1896, 1978, 1996 and 1894.
Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Prostoma”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Prostoma primary sources, Prostoma archive and Prostoma research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Prostoma”?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Prostoma” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.