Isotopes of promethium
Open-knowledge reference entry
Promethium (61Pm) is an artificial element, except in trace quantities as a product of spontaneous fission of 238U and 235U and alpha decay of 151Eu, and thus a standard atomic weight cannot be given. Like all artificial elements, it has no stable isotopes. It was first synthesized in 1945. Like technetium, it is preceded and followed by elements with stable isotopes.
The known isotopes run from 128Pm to 166Pm, 39 in all; the most stable are 145Pm with a half-life of 17.7 years, 146Pm with a half-life of 5.53 years, and 147Pm (the common isotope) with a half-life of 2.6234 years. 143Pm and 144Pm also have lengthy if poorly-known lives on the order of a year, but all the others have half-lives that are less than six days, with the majority less than a few minutes. There are also 24 known meta states with the most stable being 148mPm at a half-life of 41.29 days.
The primary decay mode for isotopes lighter than 146Pm is electron capture resulting in isotopes of neodymium, and the primary decay mode heavier than 146Pm is beta decay giving isotopes of samarium; promethium-146 itself decays both ways.
List of isotopes
Stability of promethium isotopes
Promethium is one of the two elements of the first 82 elements that has no stable isotopes. This is a rarely occurring effect of the liquid drop model.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Isotopes of promethium” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q550394. The first chronological checks are 1945.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Isotopes of promethium”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Isotopes of promethium primary sources, Isotopes of promethium archive and Isotopes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Isotopes of promethium”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Isotopes of promethium” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.