CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

George Hazboun

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 5, 2025
Entity authorityQ22278160 ↗
Source-derived summary

George Hazboun (born 1951 in Amman, Jordan), has served several posts; as the Dean of the faculty of law at the University of Jordan, Professor Hazboun served as a visiting professor at the school of Law in Damascus and in Houston Texas during the Sabbaticals. He served as a member of the ICC National Committee in Jordan as the President of the American University of Madaba. George served as a member of the Board of the Jordan institute of Judiciary and also served a member of the Higher Education Commission in Jordan.

George founded the law firm Hazboun & Co. in 1979. later the ICLC, specialized in legal issues related to Business law, Banking, Construct Contracts (FIDIC), Energy, Maritime and Shipping, Corporate, Aviation, ADR and Arbitration. George is member of various international professional institution including; the American Arbitration Association (Arbitration Panel), the Canadian Arbitration Center, the ICC Commission on Arbitration and ADR, he is also enlisted as a member of the Jordan Bar Association. George as a sole arbitration, Member and Chairman of (Arbitration Panels) in many international and Domestic arbitration cases.

George also served as attorney before international and domestic arbitration Panels and courts and published various legal articles in several reputable journals and periodic on arbitration multinational and energy topics. He contributed in drafting many Laws and Statutes in Jordan, the GCC Countries and the World Bank.

Editorial summary

“George Hazboun” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what George, Hazboun and Open-knowledge can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1951, 1979—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around George, Hazboun and Open-knowledge.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“George Hazboun” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, George, Hazboun and Open-knowledge provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 5, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q22278160. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1951 and 1979.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “George Hazboun”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow George Hazboun primary sources, George Hazboun archive and George research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “George Hazboun”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “George Hazboun” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.