Process art
art in which the process of creating it becomes the subject matter

Process art is an artistic movement where the end product of art and craft, the objet d’art (work of art/found object), is not the principal focus; the process of its making is one of the most relevant aspects if not the most important one: the gathering, sorting, collating, associating, patterning, and moreover the initiation of actions and proceedings. Process artists saw art as humans partnering with intrinsic material expression. Process art is primarily interested in demonstrating forces on matter and defends the idea that the process of creating the work of art can be an art piece itself. Artist Robert Morris refers to the artistic approach as “anti-form”, meaning there is no inherent relation to the physical object.
History & Movement
Process art has been marked as a creative movement in the United States and Europe in the mid-1960s, formed in response to Minimalist art. In general, process artists rejected the idea of a simple, finished piece, and focused more on the artistic process itself. One of its primary influences was Jackson Pollock’s drip painting technique, which involved flinging paint onto a horizontal surface, covering the entire canvas and using the full force of his body to paint. Privileging such instances of indeterminacy in pursuit of change and transience, Process artists also draw influence from performance art and the Dada movement. In 1968, Robert Morris had a groundbreaking exhibition in the Guggenheim Museum, which accompanied an essay defining process art. The Museum website states:
Process Artists were involved in issues attendant to the body, random occurrences, improvisation, and the liberating qualities of nontraditional materials such as wax, felt, and latex.
The public source identifies “Process art” as art in which the process of creating it becomes the subject matter. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Process, process and creating.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Process art”, the useful work is to connect “art in which the process of creating it becomes the subject matter” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q545851. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1968.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Process art”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Process art primary sources, Process art archive and Process research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Process art”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Process art” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.