CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Private set intersection

secure multiparty computation cryptographic technique

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 17, 2025
Entity authorityQ85846987
Source-derived summary

Private set intersection is a secure multiparty computation cryptographic technique that allows two parties holding sets to compare encrypted versions of these sets in order to compute the intersection. In this scenario, neither party reveals anything to the counterparty except for the elements in the intersection.

Other variants of this exist, such as the server-client scenario, in which only the client learns the intersection of her set with the set of the server, without the server learning intersection of his set with the clients.

For the comparison of data sets by cryptographic hashes on a small or predictable domain, precautions should be taken to prevent dictionary attacks.

Apple uses this technique in Password Monitoring. It has proposed using the technology for its announced Expanded Protections for Children

In general, PSI protocols can be categorized into two broad categories: (1) traditional PSI and (2) delegated PSI. In the traditional PSI category, the data owners interact directly with each other and need to have a copy of their set at the time of the computation, e.g.,. In the delegated PSI the computation of PSI and/or the storage of sets can be delegated to a third-party server (that is itself might be a passive or active adversary). The delegated PSI category can be further divided into two classes: (a) those that support one-off delegation, and (b) those that support repeated delegation. The PSI protocols that support one-off delegation require the data owner to re-encode its data and send the encoded data to the server for each computation, e.g.,. Those that support repeated delegation allow the data owners to upload their (encrypted) data to the server only once, and then re-use it many times for each computation carried out but the server, e.g.,

Recently, researchers have proposed a variant of PSI protocol (in both traditional and delegated categories) that support data update, e.g., .

Editorial summary

“Private set intersection” enters the record as secure multiparty computation cryptographic technique. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Private, intersection and secure can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 310-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Private, intersection and secure.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Private set intersection” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Private, intersection and secure provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 17, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q85846987. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Private set intersection”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Private set intersection primary sources, Private set intersection archive and Private research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Private set intersection”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Private set intersection” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.