Prince Ring
Icelandic fairy tale
"Prince Ring" (Icelandic: Sagan af Hríngi kóngssyni) is an Icelandic folktale, collected by Jón Árnason.
Andrew Lang translated the tale into English as "Prince Ring" in The Yellow Fairy Book (1894).
Textual notes
"Sagan af Hríngi kóngssyni" ("the story of Hríngur, the king's son") is one of the Icelandic folktales that appeared in Jón Árnason's anthology, Íslenzkar Þjóðsögur og Æfintýri Vol. 2 (1862–64).
It was later translated as "Ring, der Königssohn" by Josef Poestion in Isländische Märchen (1884), and subsequently by Adeline Rittershaus as "Snati-Snati" (1902), as provided by the bibliographical endnote in Hans Naumann's edition. The German translation by Hans and Ida Naumann in turn was entitled "Der Königssohn Ring und der Hund Snati-Snati" (1922).
Andrew Lang printed "Prince Ring" in The Yellow Fairy Book (first edition, 1894) without attribution except being "from the Icelandic", but elsewhere, he identifies his source for Icelandic tales as Poestion's German-translated anthology.
Synopsis
A prince named Ring (Icelandic: Hríngur) and his men hunted a hind with a golden ring on its horns. A darkness came over them, and they lost the hind and their way, and separated because they each thought they knew better the way back home. The prince came upon a woman on the seashore, next to a barrel.
The public source identifies “Prince Ring” as icelandic fairy tale. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Prince, Ring and Icelandic.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Prince Ring”, the useful work is to connect “icelandic fairy tale” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7244212. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1894, 1862, 1884 and 1902.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Prince Ring”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Prince Ring primary sources, Prince Ring archive and Prince research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Prince Ring”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Prince Ring” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.