1930 Peruvian Primera División
football league season
The 1930 Primera División was the 15th season of top-flight Peruvian football. A total of 12 teams competed in this league, with Atlético Chalaco winning its first league title.
Changes from 1929
Structural changes
The number of teams was reduced from 13 to 12. The 12 teams were divided into 3 groups of 4 and the winner of each group advanced to the championship group. The last-placed team of each group would play in a relegation group with the last-placed team being relegated.
Promotion and relegation
Jorge Chávez and Alianza Chorrillos placed 11th and 12th place respectively in the 1929 season and were relegated. Lawn Tennis was promoted in their place.
Teams
Team changes
Stadia and Locations
First stage
Group 1
Standings
Results
* As Alianza Lima's 2–1 victory over Escuela de Hidroaviación was considered to have been secured by an illegitimate penalty goal, the two teams agreed to play a friendly rematch on Wednesday, 24 September. Alianza Lima won the match by a score of 5–1
Group 2
Standings
Results
* The match between Ciclista Lima and Sport Progreso, originally played on 9 November 1930, was declared void after Sport Progreso arrived late for the fixture. The match was subsequently replayed on 23 November.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “1930 Peruvian Primera División” as football league season. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as football league season. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2953556. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1930 and 1929.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “1930 Peruvian Primera División”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow 1930 Peruvian Primera División primary sources, 1930 Peruvian Primera División archive and Peruvian research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1930 Peruvian Primera División”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “1930 Peruvian Primera División” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.