CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Predicted Aligned Error

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 20, 2026
Entity authorityQ119999430
Source-derived summary

The Predicted Aligned Error (PAE) is a quantitative output produced by AlphaFold, a protein structure prediction system developed by DeepMind, and other similar programs. During training, the aligned error between two residues, i and j is calculated by aligning the predicted N, Cα, and C atoms of residue i onto the same atoms in the experimental structure in the training data, and measuring the resulting distance between the predicted position of the Cα atom of residue j and the experimental position of that atom. The network is trained to calculate a probability distribution over the aligned error for each pair of residues from which the PAE for each pair can be calculated. Thus, the PAE estimates the expected positional error for each residue in a predicted protein structure given the alignment of the predicted structure onto the experimental structure on a different residue. This measurement helps scientists assess the confidence in the relative positions and orientations of different parts of the predicted protein model.

Calculation and presentation

The AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 networks are trained to produce a probability distribution over the predicted aligned error in 64 bins,

p

i

j

b

{\displaystyle p_{ij}^{b}}

, such that bins 1-64 cover (0,0.5), (0.5,1.0),..., (31.0,31.5), (31.5-), where the last bin covers all distances larger than 31.5 Å. The sum over all 64 bins is 1.0:

b

=

1

64

p

i

j

b

=

1

{\displaystyle \sum _{b=1}^{64}p_{ij}^{b}=1}

The PAE is calculated by multiplying each probability by the center value of each bin and summing:

P

A

E

i

j

=

b

=

1

64

p

i

j

b

Δ

b

{\displaystyle PAE_{ij}=\sum _{b=1}^{64}p_{ij}^{b}\Delta _{b}}

where

Δ

b

=

(

b

0.5

)

/

2

{\displaystyle \Delta _{b}=(b-0.5)/2}

.

PAE is presented as a two-dimensional (2D) interactive plot where the color at coordinates (x, y) represents the predicted position error at residue x if the predicted and true structures were aligned on residue y. Lower PAE values for residue pairs from different domains suggest well-defined relative positions and orientations in the prediction, while higher PAE values indicate uncertainty in the relative positions or orientations.

Users can download the raw PAE data for all residue pairs in a custom JSON format for further analysis or visualization using a programming language such as Python. The format of the JSON file is as follows:

[

{

"predicted_aligned_error": [[0, 1, 4, 7, 9, ...], ...],

"max_predicted_aligned_error": 31.75

}

]

In the JSON file, the field predicted_aligned_error provides the PAE value for each residue pair (rounded to the nearest integer), and the field max_predicted_aligned_error gives the maximum possible PAE value, which is capped at 31.75 Å. The PAE is measured in Ångströms.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Predicted Aligned Error” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Predicted, Aligned and Error.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 447-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Predicted, Aligned and Error providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Predicted Aligned Error”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q119999430. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Predicted Aligned Error”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Predicted Aligned Error primary sources, Predicted Aligned Error archive and Predicted research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Predicted Aligned Error”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Predicted Aligned Error” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.