CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Prague 18

place in Czech Republic

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 19, 2023
Entity authorityQ106070858 ↗
Source-derived summary

Prague 18 is a municipal district (městská část) in Prague. It is located in the north-eastern part of the city. It is formed by one cadastre Letňany. Prague 18 has 21,702 inhabitants as of 2021.

The administrative district (správní obvod) of the same name consists of municipal districts Prague 18 and Čakovice.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Prague 18” as place in Czech Republic. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Prague, place and Czech.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2021—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Prague, place and Czech providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Prague 18”, the useful work is to connect “place in Czech Republic” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 19, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q106070858. Authority coordinates are 50.136, 14.512. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2021.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Prague 18”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Prague 18 primary sources, Prague 18 archive and Prague research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Prague 18”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Prague 18” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.