CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Power associativity

property of a binary operation

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ1822837
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, specifically in abstract algebra, power associativity is the property of a binary operation that integer powers (

x

n

{\displaystyle x^{n}}

) are well-defined; it implies that

x

m

x

n

=

x

m

+

n

{\displaystyle x^{m}*x^{n}=x^{m+n}}

for all positive integers

m

,

n

{\displaystyle m,n}

. It is a weak form of associativity.

Definition

An algebra (or more generally a magma) is power-associative if the subalgebra generated by any element is associative. So any product of

n

{\displaystyle n}

instances of an element

x

{\displaystyle x}

has the same value, denoted

x

n

{\displaystyle x^{n}}

, regardless of parenthesization. For example,

x

(

x

(

x

x

)

)

=

{\displaystyle x*(x*(x*x))=\,}

x

(

(

x

x

)

x

)

=

{\displaystyle x*((x*x)*x)=\,}

(

x

x

)

(

x

x

)

=

{\displaystyle (x*x)*(x*x)=\,}

(

x

(

x

x

)

)

x

=

{\displaystyle (x*(x*x))*x=\,}

(

(

x

x

)

x

)

x

=

{\displaystyle ((x*x)*x)*x=\,}

(

x

x

)

2

=

{\displaystyle (x*x)^{2}=\,}

x

4

{\displaystyle x^{4}}

.

Examples and properties

Every associative algebra is power-associative, but so are all other alternative algebras (like the octonions, which are non-associative) and even non-alternative flexible algebras like the sedenions, trigintaduonions, and Okubo algebras. Any Jordan algebra is power-associative. Any algebra whose elements are idempotent is also power-associative.

Exponentiation to the power of any positive integer can be defined consistently whenever multiplication is power-associative. For example, there is no need to distinguish whether x3 should be defined as (xx)x or as x(xx), since these are equal.

Editorial summary

“Power associativity” enters the record as property of a binary operation. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Power, associativity and property can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 275-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Power, associativity and property.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Power associativity” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Power, associativity and property provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1822837. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Power associativity”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Power associativity primary sources, Power associativity archive and Power research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Power associativity”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Power associativity” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.