CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Potpeće, Pljevlja

village in Pljevlja, Montenegro

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ3400103 ↗
Source-derived summary

Potpeće (Serbian Cyrillic: Потпеће) is a village in the municipality of Pljevlja, Montenegro.

Demographics

According to the 2003 census, the village had a population of 122 people.

According to the 2011 census, its population was 113.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Potpeće, Pljevlja” is village in Pljevlja, Montenegro. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Potpeće, Pljevlja and village, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewMost useful as a place-based finding aid connecting the present description to earlier jurisdictions, maps and built evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2003, 2011—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Potpeće, Pljevlja and village is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “village in Pljevlja, Montenegro” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3400103. Authority coordinates are 43.304, 19.285. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2003 and 2011.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Potpeće, Pljevlja”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Potpeće, Pljevlja primary sources, Potpeće, Pljevlja archive and Potpeće research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Potpeće, Pljevlja”?
  2. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
  3. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Potpeće, Pljevlja” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.