Postmasburg Manganese Field
mine in south Africa

The Postmasburg Manganese Field (PMF) is a manganese deposit located in the Northern Cape Province, South Africa.
History
The Postmasburg Manganese Field's (PMF) history began with early geological mapping in 1930 and local prospecting in 1940s. Systematic exploration in the 1950s led to discoveries at Gloria mine (1953), Nchwaning mine (1955), Mamatwan mine (1957), and Wessels mine (1958). Mining commenced with Gloria Mine in 1957, followed by Nchwaning in 1972.
Local Geology
The PMF is situated within the Kalahari Manganese Field, a 2.5 Ga old Paleoproterozoic sedimentary basin in South Africa's Northern Cape Province. The PMF's stratigraphy comprises the Mamatwan, Gloria, Nchwaning, and Wessels formations, featuring manganese-bearing sedimentary rocks, iron-rich rocks, siliceous rocks, dolostone, and limestone. Tight folding, faulting, and jointing characterize the structural geology and ore genesis of these manganese ore deposits.
The manganese deposits formed in shallow marine and tidal flat environments through syngenetic and epigenetic mineralization. Key geological features include the Kalahari Fault and Thabazimbi-Middelburg Lineament.
Deposit Characteristics
The PMF is characterized by sedimentary, tabular, and stratiform manganese deposits with Mn grades from 40 to 50%.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Postmasburg Manganese Field” as mine in south Africa. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as mine in south Africa. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q131919583. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1930, 1953, 1955 and 1957.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Postmasburg Manganese Field”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Postmasburg Manganese Field primary sources, Postmasburg Manganese Field archive and Postmasburg research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Postmasburg Manganese Field”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Postmasburg Manganese Field” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.