CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Possible Peru Electoral Alliance

electoral alliance

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ5668506
Source-derived summary

The Possible Peru Electoral Alliance (Spanish: Alianza Electoral Perú Posible) was an electoral alliance in Peru formed for the 2011 general election, dominated by the eponymous party Possible Peru and led by presidential candidate and ex-president Alejandro Toledo.

Constituent Parties

Possible Peru (Perú Posible, PP), ecologist and liberal, aligned behind former president Toledo

Popular Action (Acción Popular, AP), with a long tradition since 1956, reformist and nationalist

We Are Peru (Somos Perú, SP), christian democratic and christian humanism

In the 2006 general election, Popular Action and We Are Peru formed the Center Front (Frente del Centro) while Toledo's party Possible Peru contested separately.

In the congressional election on April 10, the alliance won 14.8% of the popular vote and 21 of 130 seats, making them the third largest force in Congress. In the elections for the five Peruvian members of the Andean Parliament, they won 14.8% of the popular vote and one representative: Javier Reátegui.

Presidential candidate Alejandro Toledo won 15.6% of the votes, placing him fourth and failed to qualify for the run-off.

The Possible Peru Alliance has formed a majority coalition in Congress with Peru Wins, the left-wing Nationalists-dominated alliance of Ollanta Humala. Therefore, Toledo suggested to vote for Humala in the run-off on 5 June.

Parliamentary Alliance

Twenty of the 21 representatives elected on the Possible Peru Alliance's lists has formed the Parliamentary Alliance (Spanish: Alianza Parlamentaria) group in Congress. Carlos Bruce, who had been expelled from Possible Peru for publicly criticizing the party's coalition with Peru Wins, has joined the small oppositional, APRA-dominated group Parliamentary Coordination.

Dissolution

In June 2012, the 5 members of Popular Action resigned from the Possible Peru bench, due to Possible Peru support for the official candidate for the presidency of the Congress of the Republic of Peru, when the popular member Víctor Andrés was proposed for the same position.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Possible Peru Electoral Alliance” as electoral alliance. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011, 1956, 2006, 2012—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2010-01-01. The account is most persuasive where Possible, Peru and Electoral can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as electoral alliance. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5668506. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2011, 1956, 2006 and 2012.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Possible Peru Electoral Alliance”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Possible Peru Electoral Alliance primary sources, Possible Peru Electoral Alliance archive and Possible research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Possible Peru Electoral Alliance”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Possible Peru Electoral Alliance” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.