CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Portfolio Committee on Defence and Military Veterans

portfolio committee of the National Assembly of South Africa

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ107862649 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Portfolio Committee on Defence and Military Veterans is one of the portfolio committees of the National Assembly of South Africa. It oversees the operations of the Department of Defence and Military Veterans and the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans (currently Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula) as well as multiple statutory entities, including Armscor, the Castle Control Board, the Defence Force Service Commission, the Military Ombud, and Reserve Force Council.

As of July 2024, Dakota Legoete of the African National Congress serves as Chairperson of the Committee.

Membership

The Rules Committee of the National Assembly met on 5 June 2019 after the general election on May 8, 2019 and resolved that portfolio committees will consist of 11 members for the sixth parliament (2019–2024): six members from the African National Congress, two members from the Democratic Alliance, one member from the Economic Freedom Fighters and two members from other parties. Members of the National Assembly were elected to serve on the respective portfolio committees on 27 June 2019. The Defence and Military Veterans Portfolio Committee met on 2 July 2019 and Cyril Xaba of the African National Congress was elected chairperson.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Portfolio Committee on Defence and Military Veterans” as portfolio committee of the National Assembly of South Africa. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2024, 2019—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Portfolio, Committee and Defence can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as portfolio committee of the National Assembly of South Africa. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q107862649. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2024 and 2019.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Portfolio Committee on Defence and Military Veterans”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Portfolio Committee on Defence and Military Veterans primary sources, Portfolio Committee on Defence and Military Veterans archive and Portfolio research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Portfolio Committee on Defence and Military Veterans”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Portfolio Committee on Defence and Military Veterans” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.