CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Poppy Garden

2012 film

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ51886291
Source-derived summary

Poppy Garden (Spanish: Jardín de Amapolas) is a Colombian drama film produced from 2007 to 2012 and finally released in theaters in 2014. It was written and directed by Juan Carlos Melo Guevara. It tells the story of a father and his nine-year-old son living in Nariño Department during the Colombian conflict and trying to survive amid violence on all sides from guerillas, paramilitary forces, and narco-traffickers.

Plot

Emilio is a 38-year-old farmer who lives on a small plot of land in the Colombian highlands with his nine-year-old son Simón. However, a paramilitary group takes over the area and forces Emilio off his land. Emilio and his son relocate to the home of a cousin, Wilson, in a small town in the Nariño Department. Emilio goes to work with Wilson in an illicit poppy field and heroin laboratory belonging to Ramiro, a notorious drug trafficker.

Simón becomes friends with Luisa, a pretty and outgoing girl. They share adventures with a schnauser puppy that belongs to a neighbor. Their adventures include secretly riding in the back of a truck, visiting a pristine green mountain lake, and exploring in the mountains where sections have been planted with mines by the drug traffickers.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Poppy Garden” as 2012 film. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Poppy, Garden and film.

Editorial reviewBest approached as a cultural-object dossier: authorship and date matter, but circulation and reception often explain the wider significance. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2007, 2012, 2014—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2012. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Poppy, Garden and film providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Poppy Garden”, the useful work is to connect “2012 film” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q51886291. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2007, 2012 and 2014.

Critical limits

Titles can refer to several editions, objects or performances, making precise identification essential before interpretation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Poppy Garden”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Poppy Garden primary sources, Poppy Garden archive and Poppy research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Poppy Garden”?
  2. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
  3. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Poppy Garden” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.