CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Polysius

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ875737
Source-derived summary

Thyssenkrupp Polysius GmbH (thyssenkrupp Polysius GmbH) is a global industrial company specializing in the manufacture and sale of plants and machinery for the cement and ore industry. In 2023, Thyssenkrupp Polysius GmbH was integrated into the newly created Decarbon Technologies segment of ThyssenKrupp.

The company employs around 4000 people and operates in 28 sites worldwide, including in countries such as France, England, the USA, Mexico, Brazil, Peru, Singapore, China, and Vietnam.

History

Foundation and first achievements

The company was founded in Dessau: around Easter 1859, master locksmith Gottfried Polysius opened a workshop in Dessau with an apprentice and laid the foundations for today's company with his locksmith's shop and the manufacture of safes. On May 23, 1870, he founded G. Polysius iron foundery and engineering factory, which established itself in the then-young building materials industry with self-designed and powerful mills. Besides money cabinets, the company also produced drains and vibrating screens.

In addition to agricultural machinery, Polysius also produced grain mills, brewery and distillery equipment. He was particularly involved in the up-and-coming beet sugar industry. From then on, Polysius specialized in crushing and processing machines. After Polysius' death, his sons Otto and Max Polysius successfully continued the company.

Editorial summary

“Polysius” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Polysius, Open-knowledge and entry can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2023, 1859, 1870—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1859-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Polysius, Open-knowledge and entry.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Polysius” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Polysius, Open-knowledge and entry provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q875737. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2023, 1859 and 1870.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Polysius”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Polysius primary sources, Polysius archive and Polysius research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Polysius”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Polysius” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.