CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

A. Schulman

company

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ279170
Source-derived summary

A. Schulman, Inc. was an American supplier of plastic compounding products, color concentrates, and additives before its acquisition by LyondellBasell in 2018.

Products

The company's products include:

Low (LDPE) and high (HDPE) density polyethylenes under the Polyflam brand

Polystyrene (PS), polypropylene (PP) and polyphenylene sulphide (PPS) also under the Polyflam brand

Several derivaterized styrene polymers (ABS, Methyl Methacrylate Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (MABS) and blends (ABS/PA, PC/ABS), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and polycarbonate (PC) and blends (PC/PBT), under the Polyman brand

Polyacetyls (POM) under the Schulaform brand

Polyamides PA6 and PA66 under the Schulamid brand

Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) under the Schuladur A brand

Polyurethane (PUR) under the Polypur brand

Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) under the Polyvin brand

Styrene acrylonitrile copolymer (SAN) under the Polyfort brand

History

The company was founded in 1928 by Alex Schulman by selling rubber products from a plant in Akron, Ohio.

In 1972, the company became a public company via an initial public offering.

In 1994, the company acquired Comalloy International, a subsidiary of Exxon based in Nashville, Tennessee.

In February 1995, the company acquired Texas Polymer Services.

In 1996, the company acquired the Specialty Compounding Division of Laurel Industries Inc., from Occidental Petroleum.

In 2007, the company acquired Delta Plast Group, based in Sweden.

In February 2008, the Company closed its facility in St. Thomas, Ontario.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “A. Schulman” as company. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Schulman and company.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2018, 1928, 1972, 1994—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1928. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Schulman and company providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “A. Schulman”, the useful work is to connect “company” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q279170. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2018, 1928, 1972 and 1994.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “A. Schulman”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow A. Schulman primary sources, A. Schulman archive and Schulman research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “A. Schulman”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from A. Schulman” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.