CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Polycephalomyces

genus of fungi

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ10636585
Source-derived summary

Polycephalomyces is a genus of fungi in the family Ophiocordycipitaceae. Members of the genus are parasites or hyperparasites of insects and are found in sub-tropical regions.

Species

The following species are recognised in the genus Polycephalomyces:

Polycephalomyces agaricus Hong Yu bis & Y.B. Wang 2015

Polycephalomyces albiramus Y.P. Xiao, T.C. Wen, J.Z. Sun & K.D. Hyde 2023

Polycephalomyces aurantiacus Y.P. Xiao, T.C. Wen & K.D. Hyde 2018

Polycephalomyces bannaensis X. Zhang, N.Y. Liu, K.D. Hyde & T.C. Wen 2026

Polycephalomyces chiangraiensis X. Zhang, K.D. Hyde & T.C. Wen 2026

Polycephalomyces cuboideus (Kobayasi & Shimizu) Kepler & Spatafora 2013

Polycephalomyces cylindrosporus Samson & H.C. Evans 1981

Polycephalomyces ditmarii Van Vooren & Audibert 2005

Polycephalomyces elaphomyceticola W.Y. Chuang, H.A. Ariyaw., J.I. Yang & M. Stadler 2020

Polycephalomyces formosus Kobayasi 1941

Polycephalomyces jinghongensis Hong Yu bis, Z.Heng Liu & D.X. Tang 2024

Polycephalomyces kanzashianus (Kobayasi & Shimizu) Kepler & Spatafora 2013

Polycephalomyces lianzhouensis W.M. Zhang & L. Wang 2014

Polycephalomyces marginaliradians Y.P. Xiao, T.C. Wen & K.D. Hyde 2018

Polycephalomyces multiperitheciatae Hong Yu bis, Z.Heng Liu & D.X. Tang 2024

Polycephalomyces myrmecophilus Hong Yu bis, Z.Heng Liu & D.X. Tang 2024

Polycephalomyces nipponicus (Kobayasi) Kepler & Spatafora 2013

Polycephalomyces onorei Kautman & Kautman.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Polycephalomyces” is genus of fungi. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Polycephalomyces, genus and fungi, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2015, 2023, 2018, 2026—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Polycephalomyces, genus and fungi is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “genus of fungi” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q10636585. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2015, 2023, 2018 and 2026.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Polycephalomyces”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Polycephalomyces primary sources, Polycephalomyces archive and Polycephalomyces research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Polycephalomyces”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Polycephalomyces” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.