CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Social media use in politics

relation of virtual internet communities and group decision making

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ60753070 ↗
Source-derived summary

Social media use in politics refers to the use of online social media platforms in political processes and activities, including all activities that pertain to the governance of a country or area like political organization, global politics, political corruption, political parties, and political values. The media's primary duty is to present us with information and alert us when events occur. This information may affect what we think and the actions we take. The media can also place pressure on the government to act by signaling a need for intervention or showing that citizens want change.

The Internet has created communication channels that play a key role in circulating news, and social media has the power to change not just the message, but also the dynamics of political corruption, values, and conflict. Use of social media in elections, global conflict, made diplomacy less secretive and more susceptible to public perception. Social media has gained a large share of all information dissemination channels. Though often riddled with bias, Twitter, its successor X and Facebook have the potential to alter civic engagement. Social media sources also affect elections and campaigns, as influencers and trolls spread political views, voting recommendations and fake news. For example, it was reported that Russia had managed to infiltrate American social media sources during the 2016 presidential election and flooded them with fake news.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Social media use in politics” is relation of virtual internet communities and group decision making. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Social, media and politics, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2016—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Social, media and politics is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “relation of virtual internet communities and group decision making” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q60753070. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2016.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Social media use in politics”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Social media use in politics primary sources, Social media use in politics archive and Social research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Social media use in politics”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Social media use in politics” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.