CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Polish Journal of Philosophy

journal

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 1, 2023
Entity authorityQ7209934
Source-derived summary

The Polish Journal of Philosophy is a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes original articles, reviews, and other items to promote continuing philosophical scholarship in Poland. It is published in English. Notable contributors include Peter Baumann, Arkadiusz Chrudzimski, Susan Haack, Dale Jacquette, Stephen Palmquist, Roberto Poli, Władysław Stróżewski, and Jan Woleński. The scope of the journal includes both the phenomenological school of Roman Ingarden and the Lvov-Warsaw school of analytic philosophy. The Polish Journal of Philosophy is edited and published at the Institute of Philosophy, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland. All issues are available online from the Philosophy Documentation Center.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Polish Journal of Philosophy” is journal. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Polish, Journal and Philosophy, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 99-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2007-01-01. For this dossier, Polish, Journal and Philosophy is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “journal” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 1, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q7209934. 5 of 5 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Polish Journal of Philosophy”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Polish Journal of Philosophy primary sources, Polish Journal of Philosophy archive and Polish research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Polish Journal of Philosophy”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Polish Journal of Philosophy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.