Plus+
social network
Plus+ was a social networking, game discovery and multiplayer platform launched by Ngmoco in June 2009. It was similar to Xbox Network, allowing users to interact with other players while playing. The Plus+ Network had approximately 14 million registered users in October 2010.
On March 31, 2013, Plus+ servers were shut down along with the games that were supported.
Games
The following is a list of games that have been published by Ngmoco and therefore support Plus+:
Charadium (2010) - A Pictionary style game.
Dr. Awesome (2008)
Dropship (2009)
Eliminate Pro (2009) - A free online-multiplayer first-person shooter (FPS) Quake-style death match game by Ngmoco. Also includes various add-ons which give free power cells.
Eliminate CO-OP (2010) - A free extension to Eliminate Pro which enables to play co-operative 2-player matches against AI Robots in any Eliminate Pro version.
GodFinger (2010)
MazeFinger (2008)
Rolando (2008) - A game similar to LocoRoco for the PlayStation Portable which involves using the iPhone's accelerometer to move "Rolandos" around to beat missions.
The public source identifies “Plus+” as social network. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Plus, social and network.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Plus+”, the useful work is to connect “social network” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7205574. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2009, 2010, 2013 and 2008.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Plus+”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Plus+ primary sources, Plus+ archive and Plus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Plus+”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Plus+” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.