CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Pleistocene Park

ecological experiment

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ2099296 ↗
Source-derived summary

Pleistocene Park (Russian: Плейстоценовый парк, romanized: Pleystotsenovyy park) is a nature reserve in northeastern Siberia, Russia, where Russian scientists Sergey and Nikita Zimov are attempting to re-create the Mammoth steppe that existed during the last glacial period by repopulating the area with large herbivores, in order to mitigate climate change.

Climate change causes permafrost to thaw and emit greenhouse gases, creating a vicious feedback loop which can become catastrophic. The Zimovs hypothesise that the change from tundra to grassland will cool the permafrost and slow or reverse this process and thereby reduce emission of greenhouse gases.

According to them, removal and trampling of snow by animals would reduce the insulation of the permafrost. Increased albedo in grasslands versus forests, would reflect more energy back and keep the ground cooler.

Carbon sequestration underground by grasses and the reduction of methane emission through the drying of the soil would reduce net emissions of greenhouse gases.

To study this, they released several species of large herbivores and monitored their effect on the local flora and permafrost. Preliminary results show that the ecologically low-grade tundra biome converted into a productive grassland biome.

Overview

Pleistocene Park is located on the Kolyma River south of Chersky in the Sakha Republic which is in northeastern Siberia, Russia. It consists of willow brush, grasslands, swamps, forests and a multitude of lakes.The average temperature in January is about –33 °C and in July +12 °C; annual precipitation is 200–250 mm.

Editorial summary

“Pleistocene Park” enters the record as ecological experiment. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Pleistocene, Park and ecological can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 241-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1996-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Pleistocene, Park and ecological.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Pleistocene Park” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Pleistocene, Park and ecological provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2099296. Authority coordinates are 68.513, 161.526. 2 of 5 selected statements include explicit references; 3 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pleistocene Park”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pleistocene Park primary sources, Pleistocene Park archive and Pleistocene research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pleistocene Park”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Pleistocene Park” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.