CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Pledge of the Tree

event in early Islamic History

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ2617737 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Pledge of the Tree (Arabic: بيعة الشَّجَرَة, romanized: bayʿat ash-shajara) was a pledge that was sworn by companions to the Islamic prophet Muhammad prior to the Treaty of al-Hudaybiya (6 AH/628 CE). Sworn under a tree, it was to avenge the rumoured death of Uthman.

Background

In March 628 CE (6 AH), Muhammad traveled to Mecca to perform the ritual pilgrimage of Umrah. The Quraysh deployed forces around Mecca to prevent the Muslims from entering the city, determined to offer resistance even though the Muslims had no intention or preparation for battle. Muhammad camped outside Mecca at Hudaybiyyah and sent Uthman ibn Affan as his envoy to meet with the leaders of Quraysh and negotiate their entry. Uthman remained in Mecca longer than expected, and his prolonged absence led to rumors that he had been killed by the Quraysh. On this occasion, Muhammad gathered his nearly 1,400 Sahaba and called them to pledge their loyalty and readiness to fight if necessary after reports of Uthman's death. This pledge took place under a tree and was thus known as the Pledge of the Tree.

Aftermath

The pledge was successful in demonstrating to the Quraysh the determination of the Muslims. They soon released Uthman and sent an ambassador of their own, Suhayl ibn Amr, to negotiate the terms of a treaty that later became known as the Treaty of Al-Hudaybiyah.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Pledge of the Tree” as event in early Islamic History. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Pledge, Tree and event.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current 229-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Pledge, Tree and event providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Pledge of the Tree”, the useful work is to connect “event in early Islamic History” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2617737. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pledge of the Tree”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pledge of the Tree primary sources, Pledge of the Tree archive and Pledge research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pledge of the Tree”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Pledge of the Tree” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.