CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Platypelta

genus of reptiles (fossil)

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 14, 2025
Entity authorityQ50355971 ↗
Source-derived summary

Platypelta is an extinct genus of herbivorous ankylosaurid dinosaurs within the subfamily Ankylosaurinae. It is known from the Late Cretaceous Dinosaur Park Formation (early Late Campanian stage, about 77.5-76.5 Ma ago) of southern Alberta, Canada. The type species is Platypelta coombsi.

Discovery and naming

In 1914, Barnum Brown and Peter Kaisen, working for the American Museum of Natural History, in Alberta at the Sand Creek near the Red Deer River, eight miles southeast of Steveville, excavated an ankylosaur skeleton, specimen AMNH 5337. In 1971, it was referred to Euoplocephalus tutus by Walter Preston Coombs. In 2001 however, Paul Penkalski concluded that this skeleton was nearly identical to another exemplar, AMNH 5403, and that both likely represented a separate taxon. In 2013, Victoria Megan Arbour and Philip Currie continued to refer AMNH 5337 (and AMNH 5403) to Euoplocephalus, suggesting that differences from other skulls referred to Euoplocephalus could be due to changes occurring with growth and development. They also noted that AMNH 5337 differed from Scolosaurus and Dyoplosaurus in the pelvic region.

In 2018, Penkalski published a study containing a cladistic analyses of such forms. In it, AMNH 5337 and AMNH 5403 were recovered in a joint different position from Euoplocephalus tutus specimens CMN 210, UALVP 31, and AMNH 5406.

Editorial summary

“Platypelta” enters the record as genus of reptiles (fossil). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Platypelta, genus and reptiles can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1914, 1971, 2001, 2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Platypelta, genus and reptiles.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Platypelta” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Platypelta, genus and reptiles provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 14, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q50355971. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1914, 1971, 2001 and 2013.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Platypelta”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Platypelta primary sources, Platypelta archive and Platypelta research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Platypelta”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Platypelta” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.