CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Leucocoprinus birnbaumii

species of fungus

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ1393937
Source-derived summary

Leucocoprinus birnbaumii, commonly known as the flower pot parasol, yellow parasol, flowerpot parasol, or plantpot dapperling, is a species of gilled mushroom in the family Agaricaceae. It is common in the tropics and subtropics. In temperate regions, it frequently occurs in greenhouses, flowerpots, and indoor terrariums. It is toxic if ingested.

Taxonomy

The species was first described as Agaricus luteus in 1788 by the English mycologist James Bolton who described an observation from a hothouse near Halifax, three years earlier in 1785. Bolton also provided an illustration of the mushrooms. At the time gilled species were classified as Agaricus and luteus comes from the Latin for yellow or yellow-orange. Bolton suggested the common name of "Yellow Cottony Agaric" in reference to the soft, scaly texture of the mushroom.

However the name A. luteus had already been used to describe an unrelated Russula species and was published in 1778 by William Hudson so Bolton's A. luteus was illegitimate.

Nonetheless Agaricus luteus continued to be used and in James Sowerby's 1796 book entitled Coloured figures of English fungi or mushrooms his description of Agaricus cepaestipes (now Leucocoprinus cepistipes) also includes A. luteus and A. cretaceus (now Leucocoprinus cretaceus) which he considered to be "undoubtedly the same species", only differing in colour.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Leucocoprinus birnbaumii” as species of fungus. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Leucocoprinus, birnbaumii and species.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1788, 1785, 1778, 1796—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Leucocoprinus, birnbaumii and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Leucocoprinus birnbaumii”, the useful work is to connect “species of fungus” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1393937. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1788, 1785, 1778 and 1796.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Leucocoprinus birnbaumii”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Leucocoprinus birnbaumii primary sources, Leucocoprinus birnbaumii archive and Leucocoprinus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Leucocoprinus birnbaumii”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Leucocoprinus birnbaumii” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.