Brexit Party election results
UK political party election results
The Brexit Party (known since 2021 as Reform UK) stood in the following UK parliamentary elections and elections to the European Parliament in 2019.
European elections, 2019
The Brexit Party stood in the 2019 European Parliament elections in every regional constituency except Northern Ireland and won the highest number of seats and the most votes nationwide.
Results by regional constituency
The Brexit Party won at least one seat in every region that they stood in. The party topped the poll in the majority of districts in Great Britain.
Gibraltar
For elections to the European Parliament, the British Overseas Territory of Gibraltar was a part of the European Parliament constituency combined region of South West England, but votes were counted separately. The table below shows the results of the European Parliament election in Gibraltar.
By-elections, 2019
General election
General election, 2019
In April 2019, party leader Nigel Farage said the Brexit Party intended to stand candidates at the next general election. The same month, he promised not to stand candidates against the 28 Eurosceptic Conservative MPs who opposed the Brexit withdrawal agreement in Parliament.
When a general election was held in December 2019, the Brexit Party stood in around half of the total seats in England, Scotland and Wales, campaigning most strongly in the red wall (seats long held by Labour Members of Parliament). The party did not stand in seats won by the Conservative Party in 2017 along with a number of exceptional seats; mainly in London, Scotland and the North East.
“Brexit Party election results” enters the record as uK political party election results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Brexit, Party and election can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Brexit Party election results” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Brexit, Party and election provides the most credible route into that argument.
The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q96373935. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2021, 2019 and 2017.
Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Brexit Party election results”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Brexit Party election results primary sources, Brexit Party election results archive and Brexit research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Brexit Party election results”?
- Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
- What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Brexit Party election results” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.