CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Alphapithovirus

genus of viruses

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 20, 2026
Entity authorityQ15889043
Source-derived summary

Alphapithovirus is a genus of giant virus known from two species, Alphapithovirus siberiense, which infects amoebae, and Alphapithovirus massiliense. It is DNA-based and is a member of the nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses clade. It was discovered in 2014, when a viable specimen was found in a 30,000-year-old ice core harvested from permafrost in Siberia, Russia. It is the third-largest known giant virus, behind only Megaklothovirus horridgei and Klothovirus casanovai.

Description

The genus name Alphapithovirus, a reference to large storage containers of ancient Greece known as pithoi, was chosen to describe the new species. A specimen of Alphapithovirus measures approximately 1.5 μm (1,500 nm) in length and 0.5 μm (500 nm) in diameter, making it one of the largest viruses yet found, behind only Megaklothovirus and Klothovirus in size. At the time of its discovery in 2014, the Pithovirus was the largest known virus by diameter. It is 50% larger in size than the Pandoraviridae, the previous largest-known viruses, and is larger than Ostreococcus, the smallest eukaryotic cell, although Pandoravirus has the largest viral genome, containing 1.9 to 2.5 megabases of DNA.

Alphapithovirus has a thick, oval wall, with an opening at one end. Internally, its structure resembles a honeycomb.

The genome of Alphapithovirus contains 467 distinct genes, more than a typical virus, but far fewer than the 2556 putative protein-coding sequences found in Pandoravirus.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Alphapithovirus” is genus of viruses. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Alphapithovirus, genus and viruses, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2014—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Alphapithovirus, genus and viruses is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “genus of viruses” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15889043. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2014.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Alphapithovirus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Alphapithovirus primary sources, Alphapithovirus archive and Alphapithovirus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Alphapithovirus”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Alphapithovirus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.