CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Pimpinela Escarlata

Mexican professional wrestler (born 1969)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 23, 2026
Entity authoritySource title only
Source-derived summary

Mario González Lozano is a Mexican professional wrestler, who works as an exótico for the Mexican Lucha Libre AAA World Wide promotion under the ring name Pimpinela Escarlata. As Escarlata he is a former AAA Reina de Reinas Champion, IWC World Hardcore Championship, Mexican National Middleweight Champion and AAA World Mixed Tag Team Champion. His ring name is Spanish for "The Scarlet Pimpernel" and is taken from the fictional character of the same name.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Pimpinela Escarlata” as mexican professional wrestler (born 1969). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Pimpinela, Escarlata and Mexican.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 74-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Pimpinela, Escarlata and Mexican providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Pimpinela Escarlata”, the useful work is to connect “mexican professional wrestler (born 1969)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 23, 2026.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pimpinela Escarlata”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pimpinela Escarlata primary sources, Pimpinela Escarlata archive and Pimpinela research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pimpinela Escarlata”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Pimpinela Escarlata” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.