CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Chris Pilling

British banker

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 9, 2026
Entity authorityQ27517444 ↗
Source-derived summary

Christopher John Pilling (born March 1965) was the Chief Executive of the Yorkshire Building Society from 2012 to December 2016, at that time the second-largest building society in the UK.

Early life

He attended the Royal Grammar School, High Wycombe from 1977 to 1983. He studied geography at Cambridge University from 1984 to 1987.

Career

P&G

He joined P&G in 1987, becoming the brand manager of Daz at Gosforth.

British Airways

He joined British Airways in 1994.

Yorkshire Building Society

In January 2012 he became Chief Executive of the Yorkshire Building Society, leaving in December 2016.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Chris Pilling” as british banker. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Chris, Pilling and British.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1965, 2012, 2016, 1977—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1965-03-30. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Chris, Pilling and British providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Chris Pilling”, the useful work is to connect “british banker” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q27517444. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1965, 2012, 2016 and 1977.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Chris Pilling”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Chris Pilling primary sources, Chris Pilling archive and Chris research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chris Pilling”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Chris Pilling” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.